> GM Consulting Home
> Is Consulting Right For You?
> How It Works
> Consultant's Goals
> Training You'll Receive
> FAQs
> Common Issues Found
> Pricing
> Reviews

Common Issues Found During A Warranty Consultation

Warranty claims are a very important source of revenue for dealership service departments. While many dealerships are fortunate to have a well trained, competent warranty administrator who stays on top of all the changes in the warranty policies, programs, and the proper submission of warranty claims, we have found that many dealerships are unaware of very important warranty information. This can not only subject them to costly warranty charge backs, but also prevents them from claiming warranty dollars they are allowed.

Below is a list of just a few of the problems we see in warranty administration through our consulting services and warranty workshops:

  • Warranty Parts Center Debits - The WPC will request specific parts be returned for inspection and allow dealers 28 days to return the parts requested. If the parts aren't returned in the allotted time, the dealer is debited the entire amount of the claim. Too many dealers get debited due to the fact that they aren't paying attention to these requests. We have seen dealers lose over a thousand dollars on a single claim.
  • Administrative allowances - GM offers a labor administrative allowance on many repairs that are sublet or part of a part exchange program. This extra labor time is only paid to the dealer if they ask for it. We have uncovered many dealerships that do not claim this extra labor time thus missing out on hundreds of dollars.
  • Pyramid repairs - Choosing labor operations for repairs made by technicians isn't as easy as many think. Even after finding the correct labor operation, the warranty administrator must be aware of any overlaps or same system repairs within the repair order. Should it be one labor operation with straight time or should it be two separate labor operations? Does the claim need an authorization code or will the claim pay without it? GM monitors authorization codes and if a dealership uses these codes too often, they can and will take this empowerment away from a dealer.
  • Add-On repairs not authorized - There are numerous situations that fall under the category of add-on repairs and they must be properly approved and authorized by service management. Add-on repairs are frequently the most charged back items on warranty claims by auditors. Dealers leave themselves wide open by not properly authorizing these claims.
  • Authorization codes not properly documented - Service management is responsible for authorization codes even though they often don't make the decision to apply them to claims. Every authorization code must be properly explained on the repair order and many dealers aren't complying with this rule.
  • Insufficient technician documentation - Whether it is a clear and concise cause of failure or a missed transmission flow code, GM has specific requirements for certain repairs and the omission of any of these requirements makes the claim subject to chargeback.

Fortunately, all of these issues can be corrected before it is too late. With some additional training and an honest effort from your employees, a dealership should have no problem becoming completely compliant.